linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add devicetree for the Raspberry Pi 3, for arm32 (v4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:12:10 -0700
From:   Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
        Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add devicetree for the Raspberry Pi 3, for arm32 (v4)

Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> writes:

> On 03/29/2017 05:26 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Raspbian and Fedora have decided to support the Pi3 in 32-bit mode for
>> now, so it's useful to be able to test that mode on an upstream
>> kernel.  It's also been useful for me to use the same board for 32-bit
>> and 64-bit development.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
>> ---
>> 
>> v1: Gerd's patch that put the ../../../arm64/... link in the Makefile
>> v2: Michael's patch that #included from ../../../arm64/... in a new
>>     bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts.
>> v3: Mine, using symlinks to make sure that we don't break the split DT
>>     tree.
>> v4: Rely on the new include/arm64 symlink.
>> 
>> Assuming positive review feedback, I assume it would be acceptable to
>> merge the shared/dt-symlinks branch in a PR of my own for the 32-bit
>> DT branch?
>
> Either that, or I can take it directly through devicetree/next whichever
> you prefer. We have not gotten feedback on whether this looks acceptable
> or not though...

I would love if you could pull this patch, but it does require
shared/dt-symlinks.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)