[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D79A59A8-DC7E-413F-ABB8-05F373A9DFD4@raithlin.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:43:47 +0000
From: "Stephen Bates" <sbates@...thlin.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
CC: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
> Yes, this makes sense I think we really just want to distinguish host
> memory or not in terms of the dev_pagemap type.
I would like to see mutually exclusive flags for host memory (or not) and persistence (or not).
Stephen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists