[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9A271A6C-3B84-4F27-A852-CCA7AD404AB0@darmarit.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:37:45 +0200
From: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Documentation: Add ABI to the admin guide
Am 21.04.2017 um 01:21 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>:
> - I'm not a python programmer ;-) I just took Markus "generic" kernel-cmd
> code, hardcoding there a call to the script.
>
> With (a lot of) time, I would likely be able to find a solution to add
> the entire ABI logic there, but, in this case, we would lose the
> capability of calling the script without Sphinx.
Hi Mauro,
I have no problem with calling the perl script, but your last sentence
is not correct: We can implement a python module, which is used by sphinx
and we can add a command line as well.
--Markus--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists