linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: mpt3sas: remove redundant wmb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK=zhgpmcmq-CnWuU9=WRJpAaEduw63LSPLE9yZzF_sUHkM4AA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:26:29 +0530
From:   Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        timur@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>,
        Chaitra P B <chaitra.basappa@...adcom.com>,
        Suganath Prabu Subramani 
        <suganath-prabu.subramani@...adcom.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "open list:LSILOGIC MPT FUSION DRIVERS (FC/SAS/SPI)" 
        <MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: mpt3sas: remove redundant wmb

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
> Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org> writes:
>
>> Due to relaxed ordering requirements on multiple architectures,
>> drivers are required to use wmb/rmb/mb combinations when they need to
>> guarantee observability between the memory and the HW.
>>
>> The mpt3sas driver is already using wmb() for this purpose.  However,
>> it issues a writel following wmb(). writel() function on arm/arm64
>> arhictectures have an embedded wmb() call inside.

[Sreekanth] Whether same thing applicable for SPARC & POWER
architectures. If yes then we are fine with this patch changes.

>>
>> This results in unnecessary performance loss and code duplication.
>>
>> writel already guarantees ordering for both cpu and bus. we don't need
>> additional wmb()
>
> Broadcom folks, please review!
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen      Oracle Linux Engineering