linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] mm: hwpoison: soft offline supports thp migration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:40:20 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Zi Yan <zi.yan@...t.com>, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, minchan@...nel.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, mhocko@...nel.org,
        khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, zi.yan@...rutgers.edu,
        dnellans@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] mm: hwpoison: soft offline supports thp
 migration

On 04/21/2017 02:17 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> 
> This patch enables thp migration for soft offline.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> 
> ChangeLog: v1 -> v5:
> - fix page isolation counting error
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>
> ---
>  mm/memory-failure.c | 35 ++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 9b77476ef31f..23ff02eb3ed4 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1481,7 +1481,17 @@ static struct page *new_page(struct page *p, unsigned long private, int **x)
>  	if (PageHuge(p))
>  		return alloc_huge_page_node(page_hstate(compound_head(p)),
>  						   nid);
> -	else
> +	else if (thp_migration_supported() && PageTransHuge(p)) {
> +		struct page *thp;
> +
> +		thp = alloc_pages_node(nid,
> +			(GFP_TRANSHUGE | __GFP_THISNODE) & ~__GFP_RECLAIM,

Why not __GFP_RECLAIM ? Its soft offline path we wait a bit before
declaring that THP page cannot be allocated and hence should invoke
reclaim methods as well.

> +			HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> +		if (!thp)
> +			return NULL;
> +		prep_transhuge_page(thp);
> +		return thp;
> +	} else
>  		return __alloc_pages_node(nid, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, 0);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1665,8 +1675,8 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
>  		 * cannot have PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE.
>  		 */
>  		if (!__PageMovable(page))
> -			inc_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
> -						page_is_file_cache(page));
> +			mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
> +						page_is_file_cache(page), hpage_nr_pages(page));
>  		list_add(&page->lru, &pagelist);
>  		ret = migrate_pages(&pagelist, new_page, NULL, MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL,
>  					MIGRATE_SYNC, MR_MEMORY_FAILURE);
> @@ -1689,28 +1699,11 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
>  static int soft_offline_in_use_page(struct page *page, int flags)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> -	struct page *hpage = compound_head(page);
> -
> -	if (!PageHuge(page) && PageTransHuge(hpage)) {
> -		lock_page(hpage);
> -		if (!PageAnon(hpage) || unlikely(split_huge_page(hpage))) {
> -			unlock_page(hpage);
> -			if (!PageAnon(hpage))
> -				pr_info("soft offline: %#lx: non anonymous thp\n", page_to_pfn(page));
> -			else
> -				pr_info("soft offline: %#lx: thp split failed\n", page_to_pfn(page));
> -			put_hwpoison_page(hpage);
> -			return -EBUSY;
> -		}
> -		unlock_page(hpage);
> -		get_hwpoison_page(page);
> -		put_hwpoison_page(hpage);
> -	}
>  
>  	if (PageHuge(page))
>  		ret = soft_offline_huge_page(page, flags);
>  	else
> -		ret = __soft_offline_page(page, flags);
> +		ret = __soft_offline_page(compound_head(page), flags);

Hmm, what if the THP allocation fails in the new_page() path and
we fallback for general page allocation. In that case we will
always be still calling with the head page ? Because we dont
split the huge page any more.