[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f101e42e-0aed-b8ce-2f36-cf16d1964f46@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:34:18 +0100
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>,
Linux SCSI Mailinglist <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@...fitbricks.com>, <tj@...nel.org>,
<wangyijing@...wei.com>, Heyousong <heyousong@...wei.com>,
"chenqilin (C)" <chenqilin2@...wei.com>,
"chenqilin (C)" <chenqilin2@...wei.com>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Re-order scsi_remove_host and sas_remove_host in
SAS HBA LLDDs
Thanks Johannes.
@wangyijing, can you test this patchset please (specifically 3/5)? I
know that you have the modified version of libsas which you dabbled with
upstreaming.
On 21/04/2017 09:04, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> This series re-orders the calls to scsi_remove_host() and sas_remove_host() in
> all SAS HBA drivers (apart from mpt3sas which is doing it correctly). This is
> for two reasons:
> 1) After the change to recursive removal of sysfs entries, we're
> trying to remove already removed kobjects when doing a
> sas_remove_host() _after_ a scsi_remove_host()
> 2) the documentation mandates it even (becuase of 1)
>
> Unfortunately this does not completely solve issues with recursive sysfs
> removals in SAS, as libsas has asynchronous behaviour where strong ordering
> would be needed. But I am working on it and I do know other do as well. So if
> anyone else (James, Christoph, Bart, I'm looking at you) has an idea, I do
> have test setups and I'm willing to take input in form of ideas and patches.
>
wangyijing already sent an RFC for fixing this issue (mentioned above),
which was a signifiagnt rewrite of some of libsas.
I am hoping that he would retry, and that community would
support/shepherd this activity, or at least say it will be accepted so
effort is not wasted.
> I also dropped the SDEV_CANCEL state change for now. We re-evaluate it once we
> have an idea how to tackle the ordering issues and place it into
> sas_unregister_ha() as per James' comment.
>
> Thanks,
> Johannes
Thanks
>
> Johannes Thumshirn (5):
> scsi: isci: remove the SAS host after the SCSI host
> aic94xx: remove the SAS host after the SCSI host
> scsi: hisi_sas: remove the SAS host after the SCSI host
> mvsas: remove the SAS host after the SCSI host
> scsi: pm8001: remove the SAS host after the SCSI host
>
> drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_init.c | 7 ++++---
> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/scsi/isci/init.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_init.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c | 8 ++++++--
> 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists