linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: fix switching to -deadline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:42:40 +0200
From:   luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
To:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: fix switching to -deadline

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:39:26 +0100
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com> wrote:

> Hi Luca,
> 
> On 20/04/17 21:30, Luca Abeni wrote:
> > From: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
> > 
> > When switching to -deadline, if the scheduling deadline of a task is
> > in the past then switched_to_dl() calls setup_new_entity() to
> > properly initialize the scheduling deadline and runtime.
> > 
> > The problem is that the task is enqueued _before_ having its
> > parameters initialized by setup_new_entity(), and this can cause
> > problems. For example, a task with its out-of-date deadline in the
> > past will potentially be enqueued as the highest priority one;
> > however, its adjusted deadline may not be the earliest one.
> > 
> > This patch fixes the problem by initializing the task's parameters
> > before enqueuing it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > index a2ce590..ec53d24 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > @@ -950,6 +950,10 @@ enqueue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity
> > *dl_se, update_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se);
> >  	else if (flags & ENQUEUE_REPLENISH)
> >  		replenish_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se);
> > +	else if ((flags & ENQUEUE_RESTORE) &&  
> 
> Not sure I understand how this works. AFAICT we are doing
> __sched_setscheduler() when we want to catch the case of a new
> dl_entity (SCHED_{OTHER,FIFO} -> SCHED_DEADLINE}, but queue_flags
> (which are passed to enqueue_task()) don't seem to have
> ENQUEUE_RESTORE set?

I was under the impression sched_setscheduler() sets ENQUEUE_RESTORE...


				Luca