[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170421101653.uedilvqd5ww4xc3p@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:16:53 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 000/124] 3.18.50-stable review
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:17:51AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 01:37:56PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> > stable-rc/linux-3.18.y boot: 283 boots: 3 failed, 262 passed with 18 offline (v3.18.49-125-g7379419992fb)
> Yeah, thanks for adding 3.18 back to the builds!
> I'm guessing this is all ok...
Yes, looks to be.
BTW, one thing you might find helpful in the web interface is the
regressions tab - if you go to the linked web page in the boot report
you'll see a tab marked "Regressions" which if something was detected as
having previously worked it'll be listed and you can click on the build
to get the details of the last good and first bad boots. There's an
example of this happening for mailine at:
https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/mainline/branch/master/kernel/v4.11-rc7-57-gc154165e93b7/
That won't show anything here since there's not been any recent builds
of v3.18 but will going forwards (and for other trees).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists