[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <935aedd3-b80e-dd2a-150e-84af1115539d@free.fr>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:27:27 +0200
From: Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Russell King <rmk@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree
On 21/04/2017 09:58, Mason wrote:
> Weird that I didn't catch this when I ran make allyesconfig.
Doh! make allyesconfig builds for BE systems.
CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN=y
CONFIG_CPU_ENDIAN_BE8=y
But the patch I originally tested with only updated the LE bitops.
With the complete patch, I didn't see any build issues, other than
drivers/dma/sun4i-dma.c
Regards.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists