[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170421224804.4213332fafa6d9fe18868fa1@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:48:04 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] powerpc: kprobes: emulate instructions on kprobe
handler re-entry
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:11:10 +1000
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > Excerpts from Masami Hiramatsu's message of April 19, 2017 20:13:
> >>
> >> BTW, as I pointed, 5/7 and 6/7 should be merged since this actually
> >> makes meaningful change.
> >
> > Yes, sorry if I wasn't clear in my previous reply in the (!) previous
> > patch series.
> >
> > Since this has to go through the powerpc tree, I followed this since I
> > felt that Michael Ellerman prefers to keep functional changes separate
> > from refactoring. I'm fine with either approach.
> >
> > Michael?
>
> Yeah I'd definitely like this to be two patches. Otherwise when reading
> the combined diff it's much harder to see the change.
OK, let it be so.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thanks,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists