[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <c83bd8cf-cd83-f1d2-b982-a0cacf81370f@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:10:57 -0500
From: Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
timur@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>,
Chaitra P B <chaitra.basappa@...adcom.com>,
Suganath Prabu Subramani
<suganath-prabu.subramani@...adcom.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"open list:LSILOGIC MPT FUSION DRIVERS (FC/SAS/SPI)"
<MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: mpt3sas: remove redundant wmb
On 04/21/2017 02:56 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Martin K. Petersen
> <martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>> Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>> Due to relaxed ordering requirements on multiple architectures,
>>> drivers are required to use wmb/rmb/mb combinations when they need to
>>> guarantee observability between the memory and the HW.
>>>
>>> The mpt3sas driver is already using wmb() for this purpose. However,
>>> it issues a writel following wmb(). writel() function on arm/arm64
>>> arhictectures have an embedded wmb() call inside.
>
> [Sreekanth] Whether same thing applicable for SPARC & POWER
> architectures. If yes then we are fine with this patch changes.
This is also true for Power.
Reviewed-by: Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
-Brian
--
Brian King
Power Linux I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists