[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1492804506.2550.26.camel@sandisk.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:55:07 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
To: "elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net" <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "leonro@...lanox.com" <leonro@...lanox.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"yishaih@...lanox.com" <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
"sean.hefty@...el.com" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
"majd@...lanox.com" <majd@...lanox.com>,
"hal.rosenstock@...il.com" <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
"dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"matanb@...lanox.com" <matanb@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 21:21 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I don't think this patch series falls in either category
>
> I find that my update suggestion touches some aspects for the desired
> source code quality, doesn't it?
No.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists