lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 22 Apr 2017 15:55:21 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name provided during probe registration

"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> When a kprobe is being registered, we use the symbol_name field to
> lookup the address where the probe should be placed. Since this is a
> user-provided field, let's ensure that the length of the string is
> within expected limits.

What are we actually trying to protect against here?

If you ignore powerpc for a moment, kprobe_lookup_name() is just
kallsyms_lookup_name().

All kallsyms_lookup_name() does with name is strcmp() it against a
legitimate symbol name which is at most KSYM_NAME_LEN.

So I don't think any of this validation helps in that case?

In the powerpc version of kprobe_lookup_name() we do need to do some
string juggling, for which it helps to know the input is sane. But I
think we should just make that code more robust by checking the input
before we do anything with it.

cheers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists