lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 23 Apr 2017 12:53:46 +0200
From:   John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Question on the five-level page table support patches

Hi Kirill!

I recently read the LWN article on your and your colleagues work to
add five-level page table support for x86 to the Linux kernel [1]
and I got your email address from the last patch of the series.

Since this extends the address space beyond 48-bits, as you may know,
it will cause potential headaches with Javascript engines which use
tagged pointers. On SPARC, the virtual address space already extends
to 52 bits and we are running into these very issues with Javascript
engines on SPARC.

Now, a possible way to mitigate this problem would be to pass the
"hint" parameter to mmap() in order to tell the kernel not to allocate
memory beyond the 48 bits address space. Unfortunately, on Linux this
will only work when the area pointed to by "hint" is unallocated which
means one cannot simply use a hardcoded "hint" to mitigate this problem.

However, since this trick still works on NetBSD and used to work on
Linux [3], I was wondering whether there are plans to bring back
this behavior to mmap() in Linux.

Currently, people are using ugly work-arounds [4] to address this
problem which involve a manual iteration over memory blocks and
basically implementing another allocator in the user space
application.

Thanks,
Adrian

> [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/717293/
> [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/717300/
> [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824449#22
> [4] https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/dfaafbaaa291

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@...ian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ