[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOtvUMebvRFwOFJh7CeesJOfjBuk8hKbEuZiRHaXNR-WtnrQzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 12:38:05 +0300
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>,
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad.benyossef@....com>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Ofir Drang <ofir.drang@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] staging: ccree: introduce CryptoCell HW driver
Hi,
[ Re sending with all recipients this time ... ]
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > Oh, I have to ask, do you really mean "any later version" here and
>> > elsewhere?
>> >
>> > If so, then your MODULE_LICENSE() marking is wrong, please fix that up,
>> > or fix up the license text, I can't take incompatible ones without
>> > getting angry emails from legal people sent to me...
>> >
>>
>> Thanks for noticing this.
>>
>> The copyright + license notice is a boilerplate I got from the powers
>> that be here.
>>
>> I'll consult internally what is the proper action. I don't want to
>> make legal mad either... :-)
>
> Ok, I'll drop this patch series then, and wait for an updated one with
> this fixed up.
This issue, along with some others pointed by reviewers, are fixed in
v3 of the patch set.
I will be happy if you choose to take it into the staging tree and
will continue to work to cut down the TODO list.
Thanks,
Gilad
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
"If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a
situation where the homework eats your dog?"
-- Jean-Baptiste Queru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists