[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170424065754.pv7rjvf2fckpo2fc@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:57:54 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [mtd] 42e9401bd1:
WARNING:at_kernel/locking/lockdep.c:#__bfs
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:47:29AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>
> commit: 42e9401bd1467d22c4dc4d2c637347b874e6a80b ("mtd: Add partition device node to mtd partition devices")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
> in testcase: trinity
> with following parameters:
>
> runtime: 300s
>
> test-description: Trinity is a linux system call fuzz tester.
> test-url: http://codemonkey.org.uk/projects/trinity/
>
>
> on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -m 512M
>
> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
>
>
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
> | | 89a0d9a9f1 | 42e9401bd1 |
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
> | boot_successes | 0 | 0 |
> | boot_failures | 56 | 52 |
> | WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c:#drm_mode_config_cleanup | 56 | 52 |
> | BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel | 1 | 39 |
> | Oops:#[##] | 1 | 39 |
> | Kernel_panic-not_syncing:Fatal_exception | 1 | 39 |
> | WARNING:at_kernel/locking/lockdep.c:#__bfs | 0 | 39 |
> | BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 0 | 39 |
> | WARNING:at_kernel/locking/lockdep.c:#__lock_acquire | 0 | 11 |
> | BUG:spinlock_lockup_suspected_on_CPU | 0 | 11 |
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
Did someone look into this? For me this looks like a wrong report, the
attached config doesn't even have MTD_OF_PARTS enabled.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists