[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170424080056.GA20285@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:00:56 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: arm64/sha: Add constant operand modifier to
ASM_EXPORT
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:34:01AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> El Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:35:02PM +0100 Ard Biesheuvel ha dit:
>
> > On 18 April 2017 at 15:47, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> > >> The operand is an integer constant, make the constness explicit by
> > >> adding the modifier. This is needed for clang to generate valid code
> > >> and also works with gcc.
> > >
> > > Actually it doesn't work with all gcc. I've got an older arm64 toolchain that I
> > > only use for syntax checking (and hence I don't care if it is the latest and
> > > greatest) and this commit breaks it:
> > >
> > > arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce-glue.c:21:2: error: invalid 'asm': invalid
> > > operand prefix '%c'
> > > asm(".globl " #sym "; .set " #sym ", %c0" :: "i"(val));
>
> Sorry about that :(
So what's the consensus? Should I revert this patch?
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists