[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2250946.xrPjMl5Kf1@diego>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:26:49 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, briannorris@...omium.org,
dianders@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: update cpu opp table for rk3399 op1
Hi Caesar,
Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 14:18:50 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang:
> Update the cpu opp table for rk3399 op1.
Ideally this should contain something about the "why".
Are these new voltage settings safer to operate under?
No need to resend, please just clarify the reason.
Thanks
Heiko
>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
> ---
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-opp.dtsi | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-opp.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-opp.dtsi index dd82e16..92bd615
> 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-opp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-opp.dtsi
> @@ -52,27 +52,27 @@
> };
> opp01 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
> - opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <825000>;
> };
> opp02 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
> - opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <850000>;
> };
> opp03 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
> - opp-microvolt = <875000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <900000>;
> };
> opp04 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
> - opp-microvolt = <925000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <975000>;
> };
> opp05 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
> - opp-microvolt = <1050000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
> };
> opp06 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1512000000>;
> - opp-microvolt = <1125000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <1150000>;
> };
> };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists