[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170424094338.GC2137@mai>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:43:38 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: sboyd@...eaurora.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
xuwei5@...ilicon.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] clk: hi6220: Add the hi655x's pmic clock
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:31:54AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Apr 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> > The hi655x multi function device is a PMIC providing regulators.
> >
> > The PMIC also provides a clock for the WiFi and the Bluetooth, let's implement
> > this clock in order to add it in the hi655x MFD and allow proper wireless
> > initialization.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changelog:
> >
> > V2:
> > - Added COMPILE_TEST option, compiled on x86
> > - Removed useless parenthesis
> > - Used of_clk_hw_simple_get() instead of deref dance
> > - Do bailout if the clock-names is not specified
> > - Rollback on error
> > - Folded mfd line change and binding
> > - Added #clock-cells binding documentation
> > - Added #clock-cells in the DT
> >
> > V1: initial post
> > ---
>
> ??
>
> > ---
>
> I'm unsure if this as been mentioned before, but bundling;
> driver & architecture changes and documentation into a single patch is
> very seldom a good idea. In this case, you should split this into at
> least 3, perhaps 4 patches.
>
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi655x.txt | 6 +
>
> Patch 1
>
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts | 1 +
>
> Patch 2
>
> > drivers/clk/Kconfig | 8 ++
> > drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/clk/clk-hi655x.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Patch 3
>
> > drivers/mfd/hi655x-pmic.c | 3 +-
>
> Patch 4
>
> [...]
Yep. Will do that next time.
Thanks.
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists