linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: check return value of pci_find_ext

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170424103658.GU7152@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:36:58 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Pan Bian <bianpan201603@....com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: check return value of pci_find_ext_capability

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:00:20PM +0800, Pan Bian wrote:
> From: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
> 
> Function pci_find_ext_capability() will returns 0 on failure, and its
> return value should be checked before it is used. However, in function
> pcie_port_enable_msix(), its return value is not checked. This patch
> adds the check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> index cea504f..001951d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ static int pcie_port_enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev, int *irqs, int mask)
>  		 * interrupt message."
>  		 */
>  		pos = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ERR);
> +		if (!pos)
> +			goto out_free_irqs;

I don't think this can happen because get_port_device_capability() will
enumerate this capability and only if it exists, set PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER.