linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix ptr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5f719f78-2890-f9e0-dfc7-f7217432dad0@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:26:48 +0100
From:   Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Olimpiu Dejeu <olimpiu@...ticsand.com>
Cc:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
        kbuild-all@...org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, jingoohan1@...il.com,
        Brian Dodge <bdodge@...ticsand.com>, joe@...ches.com,
        Matthew D'Asaro <medasaro@...ticsand.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix ptr_ret.cocci warnings

On 24/04/17 11:57, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017, Olimpiu Dejeu wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Daniel Thompson <
>> daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/03/17 14:58, Olimpiu Dejeu wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:48 AM, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> drivers/video/backlight/arcxcnn_bl.c:183:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
>>>>> can be used
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR
>>>>>
>>>>> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci
>>>>>
>>>>> CC: Olimpiu Dejeu <olimpiu@...ticsand.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>>  arcxcnn_bl.c |    5 +----
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/arcxcnn_bl.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/arcxcnn_bl.c
>>>>> @@ -180,10 +180,7 @@ static int arcxcnn_backlight_register(st
>>>>>
>>>>>         lp->bl = devm_backlight_device_register(lp->dev, name, lp->dev,
>>>>> lp,
>>>>>                                        &arcxcnn_bl_ops, props);
>>>>> -       if (IS_ERR(lp->bl))
>>>>> -               return PTR_ERR(lp->bl);
>>>>> -
>>>>> -       return 0;
>>>>> +       return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(lp->bl);
>>>>>  }
>>>>>
>>>>>  static void arcxcnn_parse_dt(struct arcxcnn *lp)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Olimpiu Dejeu <olimpiu@...ticsand.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Glad you approve! Could you apply this change and re-post the patch
>>> series? Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Daniel.
>>>
>>>
>> Applied change, re-posted series on March 21st. No sure what next. Please
>> advise. Thanks.
>
> Yes you did.
>
> Daniel, do you see v9?

Yep. All fine at my end... it has my Reviewed-by: which is an even more 
emphatic statement than my Acked-by: ;-) .

I think from this point on I think I'll start posting
"[vX-is-still-]Acked-by:" replies so you don't have to worry about 
whether I've seen new versions.


> FYI, if this happens again, it's best to wait a couple of weeks then
> send the patch again like "[RESEND v9] ..." to gain attention.

RESENDs are a good way to go. Also, if there are questions about the 
code its better to reply to the code rather than the side discussion.


Daniel.