[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878tmqqyuy.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:16:21 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] block: don't check for BIO_MAX_PAGES in blk_bio_segment_split()
On Fri, Apr 21 2017, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:38:50PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> blk_bio_segment_split() makes sure bios have no more than
>>> BIO_MAX_PAGES entries in the bi_io_vec.
>>> This was done because bio_clone_bioset() (when given a
>>> mempool bioset) could not handle larger io_vecs.
>>>
>>> No driver uses bio_clone_bioset() any more, they all
>>> use bio_clone_fast() if anything, and bio_clone_fast()
>>> doesn't clone the bi_io_vec.
>>
>> Hmm. From Jens tree:
>>
>> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-read.c: int_bio = bio_clone_bioset(bio, GFP_KERNEL, fs_bio_set);
>> drivers/md/raid1.c: mbio = bio_clone_bioset_partial(bio, GFP_NOIO,
>> drivers/md/raid1.c: mbio = bio_clone_bioset_partial(bio, GFP_NOIO,
>
> Btrfs use bio_clone_bioset() too:
>
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2703: new = bio_clone_bioset(bio,
> gfp_mask, btrfs_bioset);
>
btrfs is a filesystem, not a driver. So it doesn't count.
The bios it uses were not yet processed by blk_bio_segment_split(),
so changes there cannot be relevant to btrfs.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists