[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2b014f3-7674-6e33-3b22-72594b38a6b6@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:23:52 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@...gotech.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...gotech.com>,
Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IB/ocrdma: Improve size determinations in ten functions
> Markus, what have you done to ensure your patches don't break anything?
I would expect that this update step will not change the run time behaviour
for the OCRDMA module. I guess that it will influence the run time
characteristics for compilation of three adjusted source files besides
the proposed coding style improvements.
Further update steps change other source code places. I hope that their
impact can be clarified according to your expectations for each shown update
possibility separately. Some of them got a bit of acceptance already.
How would you like to reduce any remaining software development concerns here?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists