[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170424133255.0a75cff1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:32:55 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
kernel/tracepoint.c: In function 'tracepoint_remove_func':
kernel/tracepoint.c:253:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(&tp->key);
^
Caused by commit
24db7a671bd5 ("trace/perf: Cure hotplug lock ordering issues")
static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked() is only defined if HAVE_JUMP_LABEL is
set - which is only defined if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) &&
defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL). CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL is not set for this build.
I wasn't sure if just adding
#define static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked static_key_slow_dec
in the !HAVE_JUMP_LABEL case in include/linux/jump_label.h would be
sufficient, so I have reverted that commit for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists