[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1767160.ko02kahecW@amdc3058>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:25:56 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Kamil Debski <kamil@...as.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: pwm-fan: switch to new atomic PWM API
Hi,
On Monday, April 24, 2017 06:26:12 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 04/24/2017 06:13 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Switch pwm-fan driver to new atomic PWM API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > Depends on "[PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support"
> > patchset (https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2495209.html).
> >
>
> Why would this driver, which does not depend on any Samsung code,
> depend on a Samsung specific fix ?
The above patchset contains pwm-fan specific patch:
"[PATCH v2 3/3] hwmon: pwm-fan: remove no longer needed suspend/resume code"
(https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2495210.html).
It seems that the patchset name itself could be better,
sorry for this.
> Was this tested with hardware ?
Yes, on Exynos5422 based Odroid-XU3 board.
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists