linux-kernel - Re: [RFC xfstests PATCH] xfstests: add a writeback error handling test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170424150019.GA3288@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:00:19 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc:     fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, osd-dev@...n-osd.org,
        linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
        ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, mawilcox@...rosoft.com,
        jack@...e.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, corbet@....net,
        neilb@...e.de, clm@...com, tytso@....edu, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: [RFC xfstests PATCH] xfstests: add a writeback error handling
 test

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:45:51AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> With the patch series above, ext4 now passes. xfs and btrfs end up in
> r/o mode after the test. xfs returns -EIO at that point though, and
> btrfs returns -EROFS. What behavior we actually want there, I'm not
> certain. We might be able to mitigate that by putting the journals on a
> separate device?

This looks like XFS shut down because of a permanent write error from
dm-error.  Which seems like the expected behavior.