[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5DRhyRrwRoAVjd3uW6MgSUQ_k4gu8ZNQvMEh+0EcskVUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:26:10 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@....com>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6sx-sdb: Remove cpufreq OPP override
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Leonard Crestez
<leonard.crestez@....com> wrote:
> Wow, that was literally 15 minutes before my patch. In my defense I did
> search the archives before starting to format the patch but it had not
> arrived yet.
>
> Anyway, that version also sets the supply for reg_arm and reg_soc. It
> is not necessary for fixing the crash I'm seeing but is good because it
> will result in the minimum voltage on VDD_ARM_SOC_IN rather than a fix
> 1375mv. I tested Marek's patch and it works fine on my rev B board
> (which otherwise fails to boot upstream).
Excellent! I only have revA board and do not get the crash with this revision.
If you can reply to Marek's patch with your Tested-by that would be
nice, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists