linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] libnvdimm: fix phys_addr for nvdimm_clear

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170425222250.GC15722@omniknight.lm.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Apr 2017 16:22:51 -0600
From:   Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
To:     "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc:     "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libnvdimm: fix phys_addr for nvdimm_clear_poison

On 04/25, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 15:44 -0600, Vishal Verma wrote:
> > On 04/25, Toshi Kani wrote:
[...]
> >
> > Should we be using nsio->res.start here or nsio->addr ?
> 
> nsio->addr is a virtual address.  We need to pass the physical address
> of this range.

I see - makes sense.
You can add
Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>