lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170426073148.GA7367@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:31:48 +0800
From:   Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memmap: Parse "Reserved" together with "reserved"

On 04/26/17 at 03:28pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 04/26/17 at 08:22am, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > For x86 with recent kernel after
> > >  commit 640e1b38b0 ("x86/boot/e820: Basic cleanup of e820.c")
> > > change "reserved" to "Reserved" in /sys firmware memmap and /proc/iomem.
> > > 
> > > So here, we add handling for that too.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> > > 
> > > ---
> > >  kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c |    2 ++
> > >  kexec/arch/ia64/kexec-ia64.c    |    2 ++
> > >  kexec/arch/mips/kexec-mips.c    |    2 ++
> > >  kexec/firmware_memmap.c         |    2 ++
> > >  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > I'd rather fix the bug I introduced and undo the reserved->Reserved string change 
> 
> This patch parses both 'reserved' and 'Reserved' it should be fine, but
> reverting the change in kernel sounds better..

Hmm, after press sending I noticed old kexec-tools with new kernel, it
is still a problem, so we'd better to revert the kernel changes.

> 
> > in e820.c: I didn't realize that it's exposed in sysfs and had quasi-ABI 
> > consequences for kexec.
> > 
> > Agreed?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > kexec mailing list
> > kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
> 
> Thanks
> Dave

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ