linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 4/4] zram: compare all the entries with same checksum for deduplication

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1493167946-10936-5-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:52:26 +0900
From:   js1304@...il.com
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@....com,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/4] zram: compare all the entries with same checksum for deduplication

From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>

Until now, we compare just one entry with same checksum when
checking duplication since it is the simplest way to implement.
However, for the completeness, checking all the entries is better
so this patch implement to compare all the entries with same checksum.
Since this event would be rare so there would be no performance loss.

Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
---
 drivers/block/zram/zram_dedup.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_dedup.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_dedup.c
index 560b1f5..14c4988 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_dedup.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_dedup.c
@@ -109,6 +109,51 @@ static unsigned long zram_dedup_put(struct zram *zram,
 	return entry->refcount;
 }
 
+static struct zram_entry *__zram_dedup_get(struct zram *zram,
+				struct zram_hash *hash, unsigned char *mem,
+				struct zram_entry *entry)
+{
+	struct zram_entry *tmp, *prev = NULL;
+	struct rb_node *rb_node;
+
+	/* find left-most entry with same checksum */
+	while ((rb_node = rb_prev(&entry->rb_node))) {
+		tmp = rb_entry(rb_node, struct zram_entry, rb_node);
+		if (tmp->checksum != entry->checksum)
+			break;
+
+		entry = tmp;
+	}
+
+again:
+	entry->refcount++;
+	atomic64_add(entry->len, &zram->stats.dup_data_size);
+	spin_unlock(&hash->lock);
+
+	if (prev)
+		zram_entry_free(zram, prev);
+
+	if (zram_dedup_match(zram, entry, mem))
+		return entry;
+
+	spin_lock(&hash->lock);
+	tmp = NULL;
+	rb_node = rb_next(&entry->rb_node);
+	if (rb_node)
+		tmp = rb_entry(rb_node, struct zram_entry, rb_node);
+
+	if (tmp && (tmp->checksum == entry->checksum)) {
+		prev = entry;
+		entry = tmp;
+		goto again;
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock(&hash->lock);
+	zram_entry_free(zram, entry);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 static struct zram_entry *zram_dedup_get(struct zram *zram,
 				unsigned char *mem, u32 checksum)
 {
@@ -122,18 +167,8 @@ static struct zram_entry *zram_dedup_get(struct zram *zram,
 	rb_node = hash->rb_root.rb_node;
 	while (rb_node) {
 		entry = rb_entry(rb_node, struct zram_entry, rb_node);
-		if (checksum == entry->checksum) {
-			entry->refcount++;
-			atomic64_add(entry->len, &zram->stats.dup_data_size);
-			spin_unlock(&hash->lock);
-
-			if (zram_dedup_match(zram, entry, mem))
-				return entry;
-
-			zram_entry_free(zram, entry);
-
-			return NULL;
-		}
+		if (checksum == entry->checksum)
+			return __zram_dedup_get(zram, hash, mem, entry);
 
 		if (checksum < entry->checksum)
 			rb_node = rb_node->rb_left;
-- 
2.7.4