lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:56:33 +0800
From:   Xunlei Pang <xpang@...hat.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
Cc:     Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/mm/ident_map: Add PUD level 1GB page support

On 04/26/2017 at 04:09 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> The current kernel_ident_mapping_init() creates the identity
>> mapping using 2MB page(PMD level), this patch adds the 1GB
>> page(PUD level) support.
>>
>> This is useful on large machines to save some reserved memory
>> (as paging structures) in the kdump case when kexec setups up
>> identity mappings before booting into the new kernel.
>>
>> We will utilize this new support in the following patch.
> Well, the primary advantage would be better TLB coverage/performance, because we'd 
> utilize 1GB TLBs instead of 2MB ones, right?
>
> Any kexec fallout is secondary.
>
> And I'd like to hear more about the primary advantage: what are the effects of 
> this change on a typical test system you have access to:
>
> - For example what percentage of the identity mapping was 4K mapped (if any) and
>   2MB mapped - and how did this change due to the patch - how many 2MB mappings
>   remained and how many 1GB mappings were added?
>
> - Is there anything else we could do to improve the in-RAM layout of kernel data 
>   structures. For example IIRC the CPU breaks up all TLBs under 2MB physical into 
>   4K TLBs. Is this the current limit and could we just reserve all that space and 
>   not use it for anything important? 2MB of RAM wasted is a very small amount of 
>   space, compared to the potential performance advantages.

Currently kernel_ident_mapping_init() only setups PMD large pages, seems there are no 4KB
mapped or others. Do you mean init_memory_mapping()->kernel_physical_mapping_init()?

The new struct x86_mapping_info::direct_gbpages added has the default value false, it has no
effect on the existing code, after patch 2, there will be 1GB pages(1GB TLBs) for kexec ident
mapping if direct_gbpages is true.

>
>>  	void *(*alloc_pgt_page)(void *); /* allocate buf for page table */
>>  	void *context;			 /* context for alloc_pgt_page */
>> -	unsigned long pmd_flag;		 /* page flag for PMD entry */
>> +	unsigned long page_flag;	 /* page flag for PMD or PUD entry */
>>  	unsigned long offset;		 /* ident mapping offset */
>> +	bool direct_gbpages;		/* PUD level 1GB page support */
> Doesn't follow the existing alignment.

Ah, yes, missed the space. Thanks!

Regards,
Xunlei

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ