[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b79dbe72-385f-3e6c-f984-8a724f7610bd@st.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:23:34 +0000
From: Pierre Yves MORDRET <pierre-yves.mordret@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"M'boumba Cedric Madianga" <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
CC: "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
"vinod.koul@...el.com" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Pierre Yves MORDRET <pierre-yves.mordret@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32-dma: Add property to handle STM32
DMAMUX
On 03/20/2017 10:37 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 03:15:59PM +0100, M'boumba Cedric Madianga wrote:
>> This patch adds an optional property needed for STM32 DMA controller
>> addressed via STM32 DMAMUX.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: M'boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/stm32-dma.txt | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/stm32-dma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/stm32-dma.txt
>> index 4408af6..7b5e91a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/stm32-dma.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/stm32-dma.txt
>> @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ Optional properties:
>> - resets: Reference to a reset controller asserting the DMA controller
>> - st,mem2mem: boolean; if defined, it indicates that the controller supports
>> memory-to-memory transfer
>> +- st,dmamux: boolean; if defined, it indicates that the controller is behind a
>> + DMA multiplexer. In that case, using dma instances doesn't work for DMA
>> + clients. They have to use dma-router instances.
>
> This should not be needed for the same reason we don't need anything
> like this for chained interrupt controllers.
>
> Also, the compatible string should be specific enough to provide this
> information.
>
> Rob
I don't understand what you're meant here. Our DMAs can work with or
without DMAMUX driver. Driver uses this binding to use it or not.
Py
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists