[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <590066A2.4090309@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:21:38 +0800
From: Xunlei Pang <xpang@...hat.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] kdump: Protect vmcoreinfo data under the crash
memory
On 04/26/2017 at 03:09 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 04/20/17 at 07:39pm, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>> Currently vmcoreinfo data is updated at boot time subsys_initcall(),
>> it has the risk of being modified by some wrong code during system
>> is running.
>>
>> As a result, vmcore dumped may contain the wrong vmcoreinfo. Later on,
>> when using "crash", "makedumpfile", etc utility to parse this vmcore,
>> we probably will get "Segmentation fault" or other unexpected errors.
>>
>> E.g. 1) wrong code overwrites vmcoreinfo_data; 2) further crashes the
>> system; 3) trigger kdump, then we obviously will fail to recognize the
>> crash context correctly due to the corrupted vmcoreinfo.
>>
>> Now except for vmcoreinfo, all the crash data is well protected(including
>> the cpu note which is fully updated in the crash path, thus its correctness
>> is guaranteed). Given that vmcoreinfo data is a large chunk prepared for
>> kdump, we better protect it as well.
>>
>> To solve this, we relocate and copy vmcoreinfo_data to the crash memory
>> when kdump is loading via kexec syscalls. Because the whole crash memory
>> will be protected by existing arch_kexec_protect_crashkres() mechanism,
>> we naturally protect vmcoreinfo_data from write(even read) access under
>> kernel direct mapping after kdump is loaded.
>>
>> Since kdump is usually loaded at the very early stage after boot, we can
>> trust the correctness of the vmcoreinfo data copied.
>>
>> On the other hand, we still need to operate the vmcoreinfo safe copy when
>> crash happens to generate vmcoreinfo_note again, we rely on vmap() to map
>> out a new kernel virtual address and update to use this new one instead in
>> the following crash_save_vmcoreinfo().
>>
>> BTW, we do not touch vmcoreinfo_note, because it will be fully updated
>> using the protected vmcoreinfo_data after crash which is surely correct
>> just like the cpu crash note.
>>
>> Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> v3->v4:
>> -Rebased on the latest linux-next
>> -Copy vmcoreinfo after machine_kexec_prepare()
>>
>> include/linux/crash_core.h | 2 +-
>> include/linux/kexec.h | 2 ++
>> kernel/crash_core.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>> kernel/kexec.c | 8 ++++++++
>> kernel/kexec_core.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> kernel/kexec_file.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 6 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/crash_core.h b/include/linux/crash_core.h
>> index 7d6bc7b..5469adb 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/crash_core.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/crash_core.h
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>
>> typedef u32 note_buf_t[CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES/4];
>>
>> +void crash_update_vmcoreinfo_safecopy(void *ptr);
>> void crash_save_vmcoreinfo(void);
>> void arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo(void);
>> __printf(1, 2)
>> @@ -54,7 +55,6 @@
>> vmcoreinfo_append_str("PHYS_BASE=%lx\n", (unsigned long)value)
>>
>> extern u32 *vmcoreinfo_note;
>> -extern size_t vmcoreinfo_size;
>>
>> Elf_Word *append_elf_note(Elf_Word *buf, char *name, unsigned int type,
>> void *data, size_t data_len);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
>> index c9481eb..3ea8275 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
>> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ struct kimage {
>> unsigned long start;
>> struct page *control_code_page;
>> struct page *swap_page;
>> + void *vmcoreinfo_data_copy; /* locates in the crash memory */
>>
>> unsigned long nr_segments;
>> struct kexec_segment segment[KEXEC_SEGMENT_MAX];
>> @@ -250,6 +251,7 @@ extern void *kexec_purgatory_get_symbol_addr(struct kimage *image,
>> int kexec_should_crash(struct task_struct *);
>> int kexec_crash_loaded(void);
>> void crash_save_cpu(struct pt_regs *regs, int cpu);
>> +extern int kimage_crash_copy_vmcoreinfo(struct kimage *image);
>>
>> extern struct kimage *kexec_image;
>> extern struct kimage *kexec_crash_image;
>> diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
>> index 43cdb00..a29e9ad 100644
>> --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
>> @@ -15,9 +15,12 @@
>>
>> /* vmcoreinfo stuff */
>> static unsigned char *vmcoreinfo_data;
>> -size_t vmcoreinfo_size;
>> +static size_t vmcoreinfo_size;
>> u32 *vmcoreinfo_note;
>>
>> +/* trusted vmcoreinfo, e.g. we can make a copy in the crash memory */
> May make it clearer like:
> /* Trusted vmcoreinfo copy in the kdump reserved memory */
My thought is that it is in crash_core.c now which should be independent of kexec/kdump,
so I used "e.g. ..." just like one use case.
>
>> +static unsigned char *vmcoreinfo_data_safecopy;
>> +
>> /*
>> * parsing the "crashkernel" commandline
>> *
>> @@ -323,11 +326,23 @@ static void update_vmcoreinfo_note(void)
>> final_note(buf);
>> }
>>
>> +void crash_update_vmcoreinfo_safecopy(void *ptr)
>> +{
>> + if (ptr)
>> + memcpy(ptr, vmcoreinfo_data, vmcoreinfo_size);
>> +
>> + vmcoreinfo_data_safecopy = ptr;
>> +}
>> +
>> void crash_save_vmcoreinfo(void)
>> {
>> if (!vmcoreinfo_note)
>> return;
>>
>> + /* Use the safe copy to generate vmcoreinfo note if have */
>> + if (vmcoreinfo_data_safecopy)
>> + vmcoreinfo_data = vmcoreinfo_data_safecopy;
>> +
>> vmcoreinfo_append_str("CRASHTIME=%ld\n", get_seconds());
>> update_vmcoreinfo_note();
>> }
>> diff --git a/kernel/kexec.c b/kernel/kexec.c
>> index 980936a..e62ec4d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/kexec.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kexec.c
>> @@ -144,6 +144,14 @@ static int do_kexec_load(unsigned long entry, unsigned long nr_segments,
>> if (ret)
>> goto out;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Some architecture(like S390) may touch the crash memory before
>> + * machine_kexec_prepare(), we must copy vmcoreinfo data after it.
>> + */
>> + ret = kimage_crash_copy_vmcoreinfo(image);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> for (i = 0; i < nr_segments; i++) {
>> ret = kimage_load_segment(image, &image->segment[i]);
>> if (ret)
>> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
>> index ae1a3ba..bac1b4f 100644
>> --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
>> @@ -481,6 +481,40 @@ struct page *kimage_alloc_control_pages(struct kimage *image,
>> return pages;
>> }
>>
>> +int kimage_crash_copy_vmcoreinfo(struct kimage *image)
>> +{
>> + struct page *vmcoreinfo_page;
>> + void *safecopy;
>> +
>> + if (image->type != KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * For kdump, allocate one vmcoreinfo safe copy from the
>> + * crash memory. as we have arch_kexec_protect_crashkres()
>> + * after kexec syscall, we naturally protect it from write
>> + * (even read) access under kernel direct mapping. But on
>> + * the other hand, we still need to operate it when crash
>> + * happens to generate vmcoreinfo note, hereby we rely on
>> + * vmap for this purpose.
>> + */
>> + vmcoreinfo_page = kimage_alloc_control_pages(image, 0);
>> + if (!vmcoreinfo_page) {
>> + pr_warn("Could not allocate vmcoreinfo buffer\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> + safecopy = vmap(&vmcoreinfo_page, 1, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
>> + if (!safecopy) {
>> + pr_warn("Could not vmap vmcoreinfo buffer\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + image->vmcoreinfo_data_copy = safecopy;
>> + crash_update_vmcoreinfo_safecopy(safecopy);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int kimage_add_entry(struct kimage *image, kimage_entry_t entry)
>> {
>> if (*image->entry != 0)
>> @@ -598,6 +632,11 @@ void kimage_free(struct kimage *image)
>> if (image->file_mode)
>> kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(image);
>>
>> + if (image->vmcoreinfo_data_copy) {
>> + crash_update_vmcoreinfo_safecopy(NULL);
>> + vunmap(image->vmcoreinfo_data_copy);
>> + }
>> +
> Should move above chunk before the freeing of the actual page?
It should be fine, because it is allocated from the reserved memory, it doesn't
need to be freed. Anyway I can move it above to avoid confusion. Thanks!
Regards,
Xunlei
>
>> kfree(image);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
>> index b118735..f78f719 100644
>> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
>> @@ -304,6 +304,14 @@ void kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
>> if (ret)
>> goto out;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Some architecture(like S390) may touch the crash memory before
>> + * machine_kexec_prepare(), we must copy vmcoreinfo data after it.
>> + */
>> + ret = kimage_crash_copy_vmcoreinfo(image);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> ret = kexec_calculate_store_digests(image);
>> if (ret)
>> goto out;
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kexec mailing list
>> kexec@...ts.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
> Thanks
> Dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
Powered by blists - more mailing lists