[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170426101819.fswayow3ga7hnxsb@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:18:19 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwindsor@...il.com,
ishkamiel@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: convert threshold_bank.cpus from atomic_t to
refcount_t
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:38:56PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
>
> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists