lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170426115759.GB8813@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:57:59 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Adrian Salido <salidoa@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: platform: fix race condition with
 driver_override

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 04:55:26PM -0700, Adrian Salido wrote:
> The driver_override implementation is susceptible to race condition when
> different threads are reading vs storing a different driver override.
> Add locking to avoid race condition.
> 
> Fixes: 3d713e0e382e ("driver core: platform: add device binding path 'driver_override'")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Salido <salidoa@...gle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/platform.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index c2456839214a..493e03fa0e07 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ static ssize_t driver_override_store(struct device *dev,
>  				     const char *buf, size_t count)
>  {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> -	char *driver_override, *old = pdev->driver_override, *cp;
> +	char *driver_override, *old, *cp;
>  
>  	if (count > PATH_MAX)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -879,12 +879,15 @@ static ssize_t driver_override_store(struct device *dev,
>  	if (cp)
>  		*cp = '\0';
>  
> +	device_lock(dev);
> +	old = pdev->driver_override;
>  	if (strlen(driver_override)) {
>  		pdev->driver_override = driver_override;
>  	} else {
>  		kfree(driver_override);
>  		pdev->driver_override = NULL;
>  	}
> +	device_unlock(dev);
>  
>  	kfree(old);

Shouldn't you move the lock until after the kfree()?  Or am I missing
what the lock is trying to protect here?

>  
> @@ -895,8 +898,12 @@ static ssize_t driver_override_show(struct device *dev,
>  				    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> +	ssize_t len;
>  
> -	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", pdev->driver_override);
> +	device_lock(dev);
> +	len = sprintf(buf, "%s\n", pdev->driver_override);
> +	device_unlock(dev);
> +	return len;

Why does the show function need to be changed at all?  How can anything
"race" here?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ