[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <149321460018.18277.7857539856722003605.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:50:00 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-man@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
dhowells@...hat.com, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] uapi: change the type of struct statx_timestamp.tv_nsec to
unsigned
From: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org>
The comment asserting that the value of struct statx_timestamp.tv_nsec
must be negative when statx_timestamp.tv_sec is negative, is wrong, as
could be seen from the following example:
#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
#include <assert.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <asm/unistd.h>
#include <linux/stat.h>
int main(void)
{
static const struct timespec ts[2] = {
{ .tv_nsec = UTIME_OMIT },
{ .tv_sec = -2, .tv_nsec = 42 }
};
assert(utimensat(AT_FDCWD, ".", ts, 0) == 0);
struct stat st;
assert(stat(".", &st) == 0);
printf("st_mtim.tv_sec = %lld, st_mtim.tv_nsec = %lu\n",
(long long) st.st_mtim.tv_sec,
(unsigned long) st.st_mtim.tv_nsec);
struct statx stx;
assert(syscall(__NR_statx, AT_FDCWD, ".", 0, 0, &stx) == 0);
printf("stx_mtime.tv_sec = %lld, stx_mtime.tv_nsec = %lu\n",
(long long) stx.stx_mtime.tv_sec,
(unsigned long) stx.stx_mtime.tv_nsec);
return 0;
}
It expectedly prints:
st_mtim.tv_sec = -2, st_mtim.tv_nsec = 42
stx_mtime.tv_sec = -2, stx_mtime.tv_nsec = 42
The more generic comment asserting that the value of struct
statx_timestamp.tv_nsec might be negative is confusing to say the least.
It contradicts both the struct stat.st_[acm]time_nsec tradition and
struct timespec.tv_nsec requirements in utimensat syscall.
If statx syscall ever returns a stx_[acm]time containing a negative
tv_nsec that cannot be passed unmodified to utimensat syscall,
it will cause an immense confusion.
Fix this source of confusion by changing the type of struct
statx_timestamp.tv_nsec from __s32 to __u32.
Fixes: a528d35e8bfc ("statx: Add a system call to make enhanced file info available")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: linux-api@...r.kernel.org
cc: mtk.manpages@...il.com
---
include/uapi/linux/stat.h | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/stat.h b/include/uapi/linux/stat.h
index d538897b8e08..17b10304c393 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/stat.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/stat.h
@@ -48,17 +48,13 @@
* tv_sec holds the number of seconds before (negative) or after (positive)
* 00:00:00 1st January 1970 UTC.
*
- * tv_nsec holds a number of nanoseconds before (0..-999,999,999 if tv_sec is
- * negative) or after (0..999,999,999 if tv_sec is positive) the tv_sec time.
- *
- * Note that if both tv_sec and tv_nsec are non-zero, then the two values must
- * either be both positive or both negative.
+ * tv_nsec holds a number of nanoseconds (0..999,999,999) after the tv_sec time.
*
* __reserved is held in case we need a yet finer resolution.
*/
struct statx_timestamp {
__s64 tv_sec;
- __s32 tv_nsec;
+ __u32 tv_nsec;
__s32 __reserved;
};
Powered by blists - more mailing lists