[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05bd24d8-6840-3551-a529-c464f3b26d0a@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 07:53:24 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26 (net/can/bcm.c)
On 04/26/17 01:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20170424:
>
on x86_64:
when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled:
../net/can/bcm.c:1541:14: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named 'bcmproc_dir'
../net/can/bcm.c:1601:14: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named 'bcmproc_dir'
../net/can/bcm.c:1696:11: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named 'bcmproc_dir'
../net/can/bcm.c:1707:15: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named 'bcmproc_dir'
2 of those are "protected" by
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROC_FS)) {
but that doesn't seem to help/work here.
gcc v4.8.5
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists