[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPkE-bVuy=-QcFHMZ841ax7rfssPuBLML2aY3Yi6nGOKeCUcQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:57:55 +0200
From: Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@...il.com>
To: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"selinux@...ho.nsa.gov" <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
"serge@...lyn.com" <serge@...lyn.com>,
"james.l.morris@...cle.com" <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
"eparis@...isplace.org" <eparis@...isplace.org>,
"sds@...ho.nsa.gov" <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
"paul@...l-moore.com" <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] selinux: Implement LSM notification system
2017-04-26 17:48 GMT+02:00 Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com>:
> This was part of a larger patch set that hasn't been accepted yet. SELinux support for Inifiniband. Subsequent patches in that patch set will use it as well.
I revived this patch following Stephen Smalley's suggestion to base
the policy checksum computation and change notification on the work
you had done on LSM notification callbacks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists