linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18 "Consolidate get_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170426171348.GE9406@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:13:48 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Cc:     jgross@...e.com, will.deacon@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18
 "Consolidate get_dma_ops..."

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:00:30AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:22:00AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > On 24/04/17 20:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > Given the outstanding regression we need to fix as soon as possible,
> > > > > I'll queue these patches on the xentip tree for 4.12.
> > > > 
> > > > It looks like there is another rc for 4.11. I am wondering whether you could
> > > > try to send a pull request to Linus so it can be fixed in 4.11?
> > > 
> > > No, especially without input from Russell.
> > 
> > You could add a "Fixes" tag to the first patch so that it gets
> > back-ported to 4.11.x once it hits mainline (the second patch is just
> > cosmetic):
> > 
> > Fixes: 815dd18788fe ("treewide: Consolidate get_dma_ops() implementations")
> 
> I did add:
> 
>   Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>        [4.11+]
> 
> I thought that would be enough to trigger a backport?

Either would do. I didn't see it in the patch you posted, that's why I
mentioned it.

-- 
Catalin