[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c360ac6f9b5a9a1591757a35b8d5036@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:59:43 -0700
From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"James E. J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: ufs: Delete an unnecessary return statement in
ufshcd_exception_event_handler()
On 2017-04-25 13:30, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:00:05 +0200
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
> WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
>
> Thus remove such a statement here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 5216e33e61a3..9018f26a5667 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -4966,7 +4966,6 @@ static void
> ufshcd_exception_event_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>
> out:
> pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev);
> - return;
> }
>
> /* Complete requests that have door-bell cleared */
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists