[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68214147-bc4d-c542-ce40-78f69a63e53d@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:10:09 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To: Majun <majun258@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de, dingtianhong@...wei.com, guohanjun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/mbigen: Fix the clear register offset
Hi Majun,
On 2017/4/25 10:16, Majun wrote:
> From: MaJun <majun258@...wei.com>
>
> Don't minus reserved interrupts (64) when get the clear register offset,because
> the clear register space includes the space of these 64 interrupts.
Could you mention the background that there is a timeout mechanism
to clear the register in the mbigen to make the code work even we clear
the wrong (and noneffective) register? that will help for review I
think.
>
> Signed-off-by: MaJun <majun258@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c
> index 061cdb8..75818a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ static inline void get_mbigen_clear_reg(irq_hw_number_t hwirq,
> {
> unsigned int ofst;
>
> - hwirq -= RESERVED_IRQ_PER_MBIGEN_CHIP;
> ofst = hwirq / 32 * 4;
>
> *mask = 1 << (hwirq % 32);
How about following to save more lines of code:
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c
@@ -106,10 +106,7 @@ static inline void
get_mbigen_type_reg(irq_hw_number_t hwirq,
static inline void get_mbigen_clear_reg(irq_hw_number_t hwirq,
u32 *mask, u32 *addr)
{
- unsigned int ofst;
-
- hwirq -= RESERVED_IRQ_PER_MBIGEN_CHIP;
- ofst = hwirq / 32 * 4;
+ unsigned int ofst = hwirq / 32 * 4;
*mask = 1 << (hwirq % 32);
*addr = ofst + REG_MBIGEN_CLEAR_OFFSET;
Thanks
Hanjun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists