lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6da1799-02a1-b1dc-edcb-a2ea5563b51a@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:50:13 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        "James E. J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Checking error messages for failed memory allocations

> Basically most everything that has a gfp_t argument does a
> dump_stack() on OOM unless __GFP_NOWARN is specified by that gfp_t.

How do you think about to improve any programming interface documentation
around such a function property?

Are there any special checks needed for function implementations
which can pass the flag “__GFP_NOWARN”?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ