[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170426193147.GQ128305@google.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:31:47 -0700
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/kaslr: Add operand size suffix to 'mul'
instruction
Hi Kees,
El Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:09:13PM -0700 Kees Cook ha dit:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> > In difference to gas clang doesn't seem to infer the size from the
> > operands. Adding the suffix fixes the following error when building
> > with clang:
> >
> > CC arch/x86/lib/kaslr.o
> > /tmp/kaslr-dfe1ad.s: Assembler messages:
> > /tmp/kaslr-dfe1ad.s:182: Error: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and
> > no register operands; can't size instruction
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/lib/kaslr.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/lib/kaslr.c
> > index 121f59c6ee54..947d4aa92ff7 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/lib/kaslr.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/kaslr.c
> > @@ -79,7 +79,11 @@ unsigned long kaslr_get_random_long(const char *purpose)
> > }
> >
> > /* Circular multiply for better bit diffusion */
> > - asm("mul %3"
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > + asm("mulq %3"
> > +#else
> > + asm("mull %3"
> > +#endif
> > : "=a" (random), "=d" (raw)
> > : "a" (random), "rm" (mix_const));
> > random += raw;
> >
>
> Since there may be more of these and we try to avoid #ifdef in .c
> files, I think we should create an isns helper macro and use it here
> instead. Like:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> # define ASM_MUL "mulq"
> #else
> # define ASM_MUL "mull"
> #endif
>
> ...
>
>
> asm(ASM_MUL " %3" ...
Sounds very reasonable. Thanks for the suggestion, I'll rework the patch.
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists