[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170427082719.3wyru4bk67kdmflb@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:27:20 +0200
From: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/24] cpu/hotplug: Convert get_online_cpus() to a
percpu_rwsem
On 2017-04-26 11:32:36 [+0100], Mark Rutland wrote:
> > So we could end up calling static_branch_enable_cpuslocked()
> > without actually holding the lock. Should we do a cpu_hotplug_begin/done in
> > setup_cpu_feature_capabilities ? I agree it doesn't look that nice. Thoughts ?
>
> I agree that's hideous, but it looks like the only choice given the
> hotplug rwsem cahnges. :/
would work for you to provide a locked and unlocked version?
> I can spin a v2 with that and the typo fixes.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists