[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170427093921.GA8842@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:39:21 +0000
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm/hugetlb/migration: Use set_huge_pte_at instead
of set_pte_at
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:41:40PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> The right interface to use to set a hugetlb pte entry is set_huge_pte_at. Use
> that instead of set_pte_at.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists