lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:29:46 +0200
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Mario Kicherer <dev@...herer.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] can: fix build error without CONFIG_PROC_FS

Hello Arnd,

On 04/27/2017 04:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The procfs dir entry was added inside of an #ifdef, causing a build error
> when we try to access it without CONFIG_PROC_FS set:
> 
> net/can/bcm.c:1541:14: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named 'bcmproc_dir'
> net/can/bcm.c: In function 'bcm_connect':
> net/can/bcm.c:1601:14: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named 'bcmproc_dir'
> net/can/bcm.c: In function 'canbcm_pernet_init':
> net/can/bcm.c:1696:11: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named 'bcmproc_dir'
> net/can/bcm.c: In function 'canbcm_pernet_exit':
> net/can/bcm.c:1707:15: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named 'bcmproc_dir'
> 
> This adds the same #ifdef around all users of the pointer. Alternatively
> we could move the pointer outside of the #ifdef.
> 
> Fixes: 384317ef4187 ("can: network namespace support for CAN_BCM protocol")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

A fix for this problem is part of the pull request I send to David
earlier today:

    https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg165764.html

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ