| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170427143438.GE31337@leverpostej>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:34:39 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@...il.com>
Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
acme@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, jnair@...iumnetworks.com,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf evsel: Fix to perf-stat malloc corruption on arm64
platforms
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:49:46PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > index 13b5499..638aefa 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > @@ -346,6 +346,28 @@ static void read_counters(void)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Close all evnt FDs we open in __run_perf_stat() and
> > + * create_perf_stat_counter(), taking care to match the number of threads and CPUs.
> > + *
> > + * Note that perf_evlist__close(evsel_list) is not equivalent, as it doesn't
> > + * take the target into account.
> > + */
> > +static void close_counters(void)
> > +{
> > + bool per_cpu = target__has_cpu(&target);
> > + struct perf_evsel *evsel;
> > +
> > + evlist__for_each_entry(evsel_list, evsel) {
> > + if (per_cpu)
> > + perf_evsel__close_per_cpu(evsel,
> > + perf_evsel__cpus(evsel));
> > + else
> > + perf_evsel__close_per_thread(evsel,
> > + evsel_list->threads);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static void process_interval(void)
> > {
> > struct timespec ts, rs;
> > @@ -686,7 +708,7 @@ static int __run_perf_stat(int argc, const char **argv)
> > * group leaders.
> > */
> > read_counters();
> > - perf_evlist__close(evsel_list);
> > + close_counters();
> >
> > return WEXITSTATUS(status);
> > }
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > index ac59710..726ceca 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > @@ -1670,6 +1670,18 @@ int perf_evsel__open(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct cpu_map *cpus,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > +int perf_evsel__open_per_cpu(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> > + struct cpu_map *cpus)
> > +{
> > + return perf_evsel__open(evsel, cpus, NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int perf_evsel__open_per_thread(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> > + struct thread_map *threads)
> > +{
> > + return perf_evsel__open(evsel, NULL, threads);
> > +}
> > +
> > void perf_evsel__close(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads)
> > {
> > if (evsel->fd == NULL)
> > @@ -1679,16 +1691,18 @@ void perf_evsel__close(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads)
> > perf_evsel__free_fd(evsel);
> > }
> >
> > -int perf_evsel__open_per_cpu(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> > - struct cpu_map *cpus)
> > +void perf_evsel__close_per_cpu(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> > + struct cpu_map *cpus)
> > {
> > - return perf_evsel__open(evsel, cpus, NULL);
> > + int ncpus = cpus ? cpus->nr : 1;
> > + perf_evsel__close(evsel, ncpus, 1);
> > }
> >
> > -int perf_evsel__open_per_thread(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> > - struct thread_map *threads)
> > +void perf_evsel__close_per_thread(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> > + struct thread_map *threads)
> > {
> > - return perf_evsel__open(evsel, NULL, threads);
> > + int nthreads = threads ? threads->nr : 1;
> > + perf_evsel__close(evsel, 1, nthreads);
> > }
> >
> > static int perf_evsel__parse_id_sample(const struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> > index 06ef6f2..02bea43 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> > @@ -252,6 +252,10 @@ int perf_evsel__open_per_thread(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> > struct thread_map *threads);
> > int perf_evsel__open(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct cpu_map *cpus,
> > struct thread_map *threads);
> > +void perf_evsel__close_per_cpu(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> > + struct cpu_map *cpus);
> > +void perf_evsel__close_per_thread(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> > + struct thread_map *threads);
> > void perf_evsel__close(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads);
> >
> > struct perf_sample;
>
> this diff looks to me doing same as mine.
Be careful when reading the diff above; the open functions have been
moved, but have not changed.
I've only changed the close path, whereas your proposal changed the open
path. Those are not equivalent changes.
> i think below diff should be more appropriate fix to this issue?
>
> when open allocates and uses dummy cpus, there is no point in holding
> old unused one. instead it should free and link to dummy cpus which
> is created with 1 CPU. same will be used by close.
>
> i did quick testing on both x86 and arm64. testing looks ok, may need
> more testing!
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index ac59710..b1aab0a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -1466,9 +1466,13 @@ int perf_evsel__open(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> struct cpu_map *cpus,
> empty_cpu_map = cpu_map__dummy_new();
> if (empty_cpu_map == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
> + } else {
> + cpu_map__get(empty_cpu_map);
> }
>
> cpus = empty_cpu_map;
> + cpu_map__put(evsel->cpus);
> + evsel->cpus = cpus;
> }
>
> if (threads == NULL) {
Unfortunately, I believe that might break the logic added in commit:
9f21b815be863218 ("perf evlist: Only open events on CPUs an evsel permits")
... since the evsel->cpus would now not represent the PMUs CPUs.
As I'd mentioned in my prior reply, I think in order to use the cpu_maps
consistently we need to do a bigger rework of the way cpu_maps are used,
in order to separate the PMU CPUs from the requested event CPUs, etc.
while taking all of these into account.
Could you please give my diff a go?
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists