linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] TI-SoC-thermal: Fine-tuning for two functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:20:49 -0700
From:   Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] TI-SoC-thermal: Fine-tuning for two functions

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 05:33:10PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:24:56 +0200
> 
> Three update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (3):
>   Use devm_kcalloc() in ti_bandgap_build()
>   Delete error messages for failed memory allocations in ti_bandgap_build()
>   Fix a typo in a comment line
> 

Keerthy,

Can you please give it a shot of this series on all supported OMAP chip
boards? I do not see any major issue with the series at all, but would
like to get it tested by you.

BR,

>  drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 14 +++++---------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.12.2
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)