[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170427171730.GB7114@leverpostej>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:17:31 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: use static_branch_enable_cpuslocked()
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 06:03:35PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 27/04/17 17:35, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >@@ -1092,7 +1093,9 @@ void check_local_cpu_capabilities(void)
> >
> > static void __init setup_feature_capabilities(void)
> > {
> >- update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_features, "detected feature:");
> >+ get_online_cpus();
> >+ update_cpu_capabilities(arm6_features, "detected feature:");
>
> s/arm6_features/arm64_features
>
> And we need the following hunk:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 62bdab4..19c359a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ void check_local_cpu_capabilities(void)
> * advertised capabilities.
> */
> if (!sys_caps_initialised)
> - update_cpu_errata_workarounds();
> + update_secondary_cpu_errata_workarounds();
> else
> verify_local_cpu_capabilities();
> }
>
> Sorry about that.
No worries; thanks for the fixups.
With those this is working for me, so I'll send this and Sebastian's
patch (with Ccs) as a new series.
>
> Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists