linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: Silence vmap() allocation failures based on caller gfp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:03:31 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        zijun_hu <zijun_hu@....com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        angus@...usclark.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: Silence vmap() allocation failures based on
 caller gfp_flags

On 04/27/2017 10:56 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 27-04-17 10:38:58, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> If the caller has set __GFP_NOWARN don't print the following message:
>> vmap allocation for size 15736832 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase
>> size.
>>
>> This can happen with the ARM/Linux or ARM64/Linux module loader built
>> with CONFIG_ARM{,64}_MODULE_PLTS=y which does a first attempt at loading
>> a large module from module space, then falls back to vmalloc space.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> 
> just a nit
> 
>> ---
>>  mm/vmalloc.c | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
>> index 0b057628a7ba..d8a851634674 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
>> @@ -521,9 +521,13 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size,
>>  		}
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOWARN)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>>  	if (printk_ratelimit())
> 
> 	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOWARN) && printk_ratelimit())
>>  		pr_warn("vmap allocation for size %lu failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size\n",
>>  			size);
> 
> would be shorter and you wouldn't need the goto and a label.

Do you want me to resubmit with that change included?
-- 
Florian